September 14, 2016

15 years of deception; 9/11 reviewed



On 11 September 2001, the world was shocked. It proved to be a milestone in history. Suddenly we were "at war"; a 'war on terror' we were told that proved to be endless and hopeless.

Fifteen years after the event, this 'WeAreChange.NL' documentary challenges your ability "to see what you see" and invites you to critically re-examine and take responsibility accordingly regarding the impact of 9/11 on our lives.

We let activists, journalists, scientists, people in the street, and critics reflect on the initial events and its ramifications in the present.

A special thanks to all contributors:
Coen Vermeeren | aerospace engineer (NLD) http://coenvermeeren.nl/
Luke Rudkowski | indepent journalist (USA) http://wearechange.org/
Ian R Crane | independent researcher (ENG) http://ianrcrane.com/
Richard Gage | architect (USA) www.ae911truth.org/
Ole DammegÄrd | independent reseracher (DNK) http://lightonconspiracies.com/
Max Igan | independent reseracher (AUS) http://www.thecrowhouse.com/
Zen Gardner (USA) -
Graham Phillips | indepent journalist (ENG) https://thetruthspeaker.co/

Theme tune: Wouter de Ridder
Visuals: Matthijs van Baardewijk

WeAreChange.nl

2 comments:

  1. "Wherever a man commits a crime, God finds a witness. Every secret crime has its reporter."
    ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

    9/11 Finding The Truth by Andrew Johnson - Audiobook

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvaxr0OSBw2DtOWulcA96d7sG2rsNyOgb

    THE DIRECTED ENERGY COVER-UP TEAM

    https://salsa3.salsalabs.com/o/50694/images/Richard-DavidG-StevenJ.jpg

    Other examples of Directed Energy (not necessarily used as a weapon) are radio waves, cell phone signals, TV remote control signals, wireless internet signals...etc.

    Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or "spacebeams"). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave in California (available in the internet archives*), telling his audience that "Judy Woods (Wood) says it's a laser or maser from space" while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space. Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT. The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]

    At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood's book, she explains why playing "name the weapon" game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting "HAARP" for "Bin Laden."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In Dr. Wood's book, the closest she comes to "naming a weapon" is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.

      Early on, Dr. Steven Jones created a website he called "The Journal of Nine Eleven Studies" or J.O.N.E.S. It is referred to as a "peer-reviewed journal" but the only peer-reviewing was to screen out true scientific work and post what he wanted his followers to believe. For the first two years, it was primarily used to promote disinformation about Dr. Wood's work. For example, Jones recruited a patent attorney for the oil and gas industry (James Gourley**) to write hit pieces on Dr. Wood, refuting "ray beams from outer space." This convinced his readers that "Judy Woods" must be talking about "ray beams from outer space" and that "such nonsense has been refuted." Refuting false propaganda about Dr. Wood's work does not refute Dr. Wood's work -- yet it creates the belief in the average person that Dr. Wood's work has been refuted.

      Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins also claimed that it would take more than five times the world's energy to destroy the WTC towers. Does that mean their thermite came from off planet or "outer space"? LOL Steven Jones used to ridicule Dr. Wood during his talks saying that "Judy Woods needs to make calculations to see if it is even possible to turn the buildings to dust". But any reputable scientist knows that calculations are not a part of observing empirical evidence. What are the calculations for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look? No assumptions needed with empirical evidence.

      The bottom line is that no one has refuted anything in Dr. Wood's book nor can they. They only refute their own false propaganda about her book, not her book. Other detractors claim that "she hasn't identified the weapon that was used so she's got nothing." To the contrary. The evidence is PROOF that there exists a technology that can do what was done. It happened. That is, the fact that the buildings mostly turned to dust in mid-air shows that there exists a weapon that can turn buildings into dust in mid-air. It happened.

      The sub-title of the book, "Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" indicates that the book contains evidence of what happened on 9/11 and it is indeed evidence that a technology exists that can do what was done. But this technology does not have to be used for evil purposes. It can be used to provide free-energy to the world much to the demise of the oil and gas industry. That is, Dr. Wood is noting that the same technology that was used for evil can also be used for good. It's a silver lining in the dark cloud... while also trying to stimulate thought about "what are we doing here? learning new ways to kill or to live"?

      If you are worthy and willing to know the truth, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? as I have. ♥

      A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART ONE

      https://www.youtube.com/v/XLyNb9BjTmM

      A TODDLERS GUIDE TO 9/11 PART TWO

      https://www.youtube.com/v/5ljqeg9sFgw#t=56

      IRREFUTABLE

      https://youtu.be/r51a2HnAXCQ

      "When fascism came to America, Liberty was wrapped in the flag now carrying a cross".

      Delete